..


Sunday, July 9, 2023

PITHECANTHROPUS TWO--Missing Link Expedition to Java-- GRH VON KOENIGSWALD, 1936-38


Close to the Missing Link, but not quite the same thing...

Ames Daily Tribune, 08 March 1938, Science Page.

New Java Ape-Man Almost Missing Link
BY DR. FRANK THONE, Science Service Editor in Biology

     The Missing Link, imagined by scientists as the creature halfway between man and ape, came close to actual existence in Java Ape-Man No. 2 whose skull was found recently by Dr. G. R. H. von Koenigswald, young German scientist working under the auspices of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. This second skull of Pithecanthropus erectus is estimated at about 750 cubic centimeters, in the latest study made on the new early human fossil find. This is just midway between the 1,000 of Java Ape-Man No. 1, discovered 40 years ago, and the 500 of one of the larger existing apes. 
(Photo credit: Chicago Tribune, 22 May 1938, Page 4)
     
Close to the Missing Link, but not quite the same thing, states Prof. Hans Weinert, director of the Anthropological Institute at the University of Kiel, Germany, in the scientific periodical Die Umschau. 
     The jawbone, also found by Dr. von Koenigswald, is quite definitely human. While it is the only present clew to the facial appearance of the Java ape-man, it is clew enough, in the opinion of Professor Weinert, to indicate that Pithecanthropus lacked the pronounced simian "Schnauz" (in English, "mug") which the Kiel scientist put on his model of what the Missing Link ought to look like, when he made it a few years ago. 

Near "Missing Link" 
     So the Missing Link must remain "just around the corner." But he had a very narrow squeak this time. 

     It is astonishing that the two skulls should be so different in brain capacity and yet belong to the same species. But there seems to be no way out. They were found at the same level in the gravel beds of the same river, the Solo, and the correspondence is too close in shape and arrangement of parts to allow of different classification.. There is no question in the minds of Dr. von Koenigswald and Professor Weinert that the two skulls belong together. 
     One explanation of the discrepancy might be a difference in sex. Women, being generally smaller than men, as a rule have smaller skulls and smaller brains. (Photo Credit: Chicago Tribune, 22 May 1938, Page 4.)

Sex Not Settled 
     To be sure, it has long been customary to refer to the first Pithecanthropus skull, found in 1891 by the Dutch physician Eugene Dubois, as a female. Dr. von Koenigswald now ignores this convention, and refers to the No. 1 skull as male, and to his own recently found No. 2 skull as female. These assumptions regarding the sex of both skulls, however, are by no means to be taken as settled facts. Most striking feature of the new skull, Professor Weinert declares, is the very low arch of its roof. Much flatter than the famous low brow of Ice Age Europe, the Neandertal Man, flatter even than the skulls of Peking Man, this low bony dome from Java seems to lift itself only with difficulty above the ape skull level. 

May Have Been in Europe
     There is a hint (it is hardly strong enough to be called evidence) that the Pithecanthropus race, or something resembling it, may once have existed in Europe. The jawbone which Dr. von Koenigswald dug up is very much like the famous jawbone found in a gravel pit at Mauer, near Heidelberg, in 1907... The skullcap of Pithecanthropus No. 2 was very smashed up when Dr. von Koenigswald gathered it up last August. It was in more than 40 pieces, so that months have been required to clean them all up and fit them together.


     When Dr. Dubois discovered the first Pithecanthropus skull it was commonly given a very great age. It was assigned to the geological period before the Great Ice Age-at least a million years back. Now, animal fossils associated with the two skulls in the same river gravel beds indicate that the race during the Ice Age, probably only half a million years ago at the outside.

(Photo credit: The Ogden Standard-Examiner, 19 June 1938, Page 32)


APE-MAN OF JAVA WINS CREDENCE BY DISCOVERY      

"This new skull seems to me to be smaller than the Trinil skull. If I am correct, to be determined by measurements, the skull must belong to a female, and the Trinil skull to a male and not to a female as Dubois believes. In such case Pithecanthropus would have less brain capacity than Sinathropus, indicating that Pithecanthropus was more primitive than Peking man. 

     "The study of the mandible has given a very unexpected result. Besides its more primitive teeth, the mandible agrees in general shape so well with the mandible of Heidelberg man that I am convinced there must be a close relation between them. This would place Pithecanthropus in the line of our direct ancestors.  (Reno Evening Gazette, 01 July 1938, Page 5.) 

Skull of 'Ape-Man' Discovered in Java

The "old man," the skull fragments found by Dr. von Koeningswald show, must have had a curious combination of human and pe features. His complete upper jaw was found with only two teeth missing. They were very large, heavy teeth with the incisors greatly worn, probably by gnawing on bones. 

     He had a protruding jaw, but by no means to the same degree as the great apes. In fact, reports Dr. van Koeningswald, the great progress he had made in this direction toward the appearance of modern man is surprising. The protrusion, he said, is often surpassed by that of some present-day Mongols.

(Boston Globe, 16 December 1939, Page 12.)



University of Nevada, Reno--Fall 2023

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

NEANDERTHAL TIMES-- Dynamite at Devil's Tower, Gibraltar--DOROTHY GARROD, 1926


The Paleolinguist Bulletin                                                            Summer 2023

     (BERLIN) -- Predating the famed Dusseldorf cave discovery by eight years, a skull found on Gibraltar led to more robust activity on the narrow coastal peninsula, part of which was undertaken by Dorothy Garrod. The following is a brief introduction of the archaeologist. Included was a photo not currently found in online catalogs; according to at least one primary source from the mid 1920s, Miss Garrod did not like to be photographed. 

     Liverpool Post and Mercury, 03 June 1931, Page 6.

NEWS, NOTES AND QUERIES

     She took up the study of archaeology, becoming one of the leading authorities on paleontology. It was she, who, in 1926, discovered in a cave at Gibraltar, the Mousterian skull which is held to be at least 20,000 years old.


Western Mail, Cardiff, South Glamorgan, Wales, 06 August 1926, Page 7.
 

A WOMAN'S DISCOVERY 

SKULL UNEARTHED AT GIBRALTAR. 

The skull of a child who died at least 300 centuries ago lay on one table in a lecture room. Behind it stood Miss Dorothy Garrod, a young and pretty woman, who told the British Association how she had used 


dynamite in unearthing the skull at Devil's Tower, Gibraltar. After Miss Garrod had sat down Sir Arthur Keith, the great authority on ancient Man, congratulated her on finding the first complete representative skull of a Neanderthal child. 

     Miss Garrod said that on the Devil's Tower site she found bones of panthers, hyenas, deer, rabbits, and elephants. She had to use dynamite to blow up the hard strata of rock, and in one of the slabs of stone which were displaced she saw the skull buried. 

     She brought the skull, still in the stone, back to Oxford, and there the skull was carefully taken out.  

     Professor Boyd Dawkins told the assembly that the skull was so old that no one could really fix a time limit for it.

     Sir Arthur Keith said the people who inhabited Europe during the Neanderthal Age were as different from modern people as white men were from black. 

     They could not raise themselves into an erect posture. The skull found by Miss Garrod was that of a boy aged about eight or ten.


 
The Post-Crescent, Appleton, Wisconsin, 09 October 1926, Page 32.

FIND SKULL ABOUT 20,000 YEARS OLD 
Gibraltar—(AP)—Misss D. A. E Garod, a student of the Institute de Paleontologie Humaine, Paris, who has been excavating here, has made an important discovery of portions of a human skull belonging to a young person. 
     The flnd was embedded in hard tufa with typical Mousterian implements.
     The skull is of the same age and type as the celebrated "Gibraltar skull" discovered at Forbes Quarry in the eighteen forties and now at the College of Surgeons Museum, and according to a conservative estimate it is probably not less than 20,000 years old. 


The Daily Mail, 26 September 1927, Page 4.

     Miss Dorothy Garrod, daughter of Sir Archibald Garrod, Regius Professor of Medicine at Oxford University, has been awarded the Prix Hollandais by the (...) national Institute of Anthropology for the best work in physical anthropology or pre-history.

..

North Mail and Newcastle Daily Chronicle, 22 October 1927, Page 7.

ANTHROPOLOGY EXPERT
Important Appointment for Englishwoman. 
PARIS, Friday. 
     
     Miss Dorothy Garrod. daughter of Sir Archibald Garrod, Regius Professor of Medicine at Oxford University, has been appointed the English member of the Committee of the International Anthropological Institute, which will seek to discover whether the remains found at Glozel are relics of the Stone Age or objects deposited there in comparatively recent times as a hoax. 
     Miss Garrod is an expert in anthropology, and this year was awarded the Prix Hollandais, worth L600 (pounds), for her investigations. 
     In June last year she discovered a pre-historic skull. between 10,000 and 20,000 years old, embedded in the rocks at Gibraltar.—Central News.
 
North Mail and Newcastle Daily Chronicle, 15 November 1927, Page 6, Column 4.


MAN'S EARLY DAYS 
A Primitive Skull Revives An Old Quarrel. 
(BY PORCELLA.) 

         About primitive man, modern science knows very little.                 Much less indeed than the camp followers of science                      pretend. But it is learning steadily. The recent discovery at            Gibraltar of a Neanderthal infant skull with a high                        forehead may teach several surprise lessons. 

     ALL the professors, including the anatomists, the ethnologists and the biologists, were greatly excited when they heard that Miss Dorothy Garrod, in the spring of 1926, had unearthed a portion of a very ancient skull when excavating a cave at the Devil's Tower, Gibraltar. That rocky corner of Spain was already famous to connoisseurs in early human remains, for in 1848 Lieutenant Flint discovered a par-ticularly strange specimen near Forbes Quarry. 

     A November meeting of the Royal Anthropo-logical Institute has been devoted to Miss Garrod's discovery. 
     Both these Gibraltar finds belong to the type which is called Neanderthal Man, because the first published description of such a skull referred to a discovery in 1856 in a cave at Neanderthal, near Dusseldorf.  
     Furious controversies have raged around these forlorn remains of early humans. Long ago Huxley wrote: 'It was suggested that the Neanderthal skeleton was that of a stray idiot; that the characters of the skull were the result of early synostosis or of late gout; and in fact. any stick was good enough to beat the dog withal."         Of late the general trend of scientific opinion has been to regard this type of man as a great great uncle, many times removed, of all living races, an obsolete side-branch of the human family tree. One of the most distinct peculiarities of the type was the small development of the parts of the brain called the prefrontal and parietal areas. Relying largely on these characteristics, anatomists. such as Prof. G. Elliot Smith, had assigned ouly a collateral connection with our genealogy to this early man.

     Miss Garrod's discovery, blasted out of the hard travertine with the aid of dynamite has fallen upon the world of science like a bombshell. The remains of this five-year-old boy of long ago belong undoubtedly to one of the Neanderthal type, an indicated by the massive jaw, the peculiar teeth, and other characteristics. But in the words of Professor Elliot Smith himself: 

    "The Devil's Tower skull differs from         the rest (of the Neanderthal crania) in         an exceptional expansion of those areas      of the brain which confer upon Homo        Sapiens (i.e.. modern man) his most         distinctive attribute. . . . It is definitely         Neanderthaloid, and must have                  acquired its peculiar cerebral 
     characters independently of 
     Homo Sapiens by convergent development " 

     This is a remarkable statement in view of the status of its author. Miss Garrod's find seems likely to become a bone of fierce contention. Is Neanderthal man after all the direct ancestor of at least some of us here present?
 
The Liverpool Post and Mercury article included another discovery:

MISS DOROTHY GARROD, who has announced an important archaeological discovery in Palestine, is at present there as head of a party of women scientists engaged on excavation work.

The Daily Telegraph, 05 February 1934, Page 14

Another photo of Miss Garrod accompanied by
 Mrs. Christopher Hawkes, from the Mount Carmel expedition.

In 1934, The Wichita Eagle gave an account of other women engaged not to some duke or lord, but in archaeology:

THEY CAN TAKE IT 
     Members of such professions as civil engineering and archaeology once thought they couldn't marry because their work called them to the far corners of the earth and the life was too rugged for women. But now women are going everywhere that men go. A list of Englishwomen engaged in archaeology is most im-pressive. 








     Mrs. Agnes Horsfleld is working in the Transjordan under armed guard, Miss Gertrude Caton-Thompson, protected by a company of Bedouins, is combing the Libyan desert. Miss Dorothy Garrod is digging with the Arabs in the caves on Mount Carmel. Miss Winifred Lamb has uncovered five towns in the Island of Mitylene, Lesbos. Palestine and vicinity have attracted Lady Petrie, Mrs. Leonard Wooley, Miss Margaret Murray, Miss Kathleen Kenyon and others. 


The Wichita Evening Eagle
25 May 1934, Page 4, Column 1.
Editor-in-Chief: Victor Murdock


James C. L'Angelle                    Undergraduate Research   University of Nevada, Reno