Thursday, August 6, 2020

COVID19 -- Dr. Fauci's Death Threats--THE "STIGMA SYNDROME"

     
     "I am a clinical scientist who has been extremely careful to only ask for voluntary testing and counseling." (Anthony Fauci, 1981)


IMMEDREL//ATTN:CD@TCNT//VIA/JC:COC/CMD//URGENT//DECLSF/TTYPE



     (LAB107)--Way back in April, when the pandemic became a credible threat to the American public, so too did threats emerge directed at the White House task force point immunologist, Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, M.D. The doctor hasn't come right out and given any specifics on the content of the threats. At this point, it would be of interest to examine the doctor's archival footprint that might be of some use as to the profile of those responsible for the intimidation. 
     Of course, the usual suspect is the online troller who doesn't have a good thing to say about anyone and has the opportunity to bash individuals using available social media resources. Those are easy enough to trace. There may be others, with long standing grudges against the doctor for something he might have said during his career in public service, where statements were made that, at the time, may have been misconstrued. 



     During the AIDS epidemic, for instance, in 1978, Dr. Fauci, while employed by the National Institutes of Health, made a comment in the Pennsylvania Indiana Gazette related to a vaccine in development as a possible cure for the disease;
     " 'This is a preventive approach, he explained. If an AIDS vaccine is developed, 'people should learn to change their behavior and if, as in human nature, they slip,' they could hope the vaccine they had taken had "decreased their chances of getting infected.' " (1)
     Considering the AIDS epidemic was related to a generally unacceptable alternate lifestyle at the time, or at least created a homophobic backlash across the nation, a statement from an immunologist about  people needing to "change their behavior" might well have created indignance and animosity in the gay community. Again, with respect to AIDS, still in the news in 1981, columnist Mike McManus asked Dr. Fauci rather pointed questions regarding the epidemic;
     "Since there are now drugs to help those who may be infected, do you favor 'contract tracing' in which state or local health departments interview AIDS patients, asking who their sexual partners have been, so that these people can be contacted and tested confidentially?" (2)
     Apparently McManus meant "contact tracing," a method used in the current pandemic to locate the source of the infected person, or it was misprinted in the article. The inquiry was met with boos and Dr. Fauci had to "wave the 400-500 people quiet." Again, the reference went back to the gay community and the unfair association the virus had with it. Dr. Fauci's reply in that particular conference, which McManus datelines to Washington was;
     "I am a clinical scientist who has been extremely careful to only ask for voluntary testing and counseling."
     That reply seemed a bit out of step with his comment in 1978 about those who were infected should "change their behavior."  By 1983, the transmission of AIDS, according to Dr. Fauci, might be linked to personal contact among family members where he was quoted in the Palm Beach Post as saying, "then AIDS takes on an entirely new dimension." (3) In relation to that comment was a study done at the time and published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), relating to children who had contracted the virus from adults in their families. That study apparently made no mention of the common perception of the time that the virus was related to;
     "...adults with known AIDS risk factors such as intravenous drug abuse, homosexuality or Haitian origins. There was no evidence the children (of eight New Jersey families) had been sexually abused or given illicit drugs." (4)


     Clearly, the opportunity to categorize those with certain lifestyles or ethnic backgrounds isn't anything new as found in the precedent set during the AIDS era. The association, however, was inferred by the JAMA article that the families were comprised of gay black islanders who abused their kids and fed them heroin. It set the stage for the "stigma syndrome," in other words, extra baggage Dr. Fauci inherited just by being a part of the medical profession at the time and carried over that resentment into the next century, and the present coronavirus pandemic. Not only that, the bold new revelation by the director of the National Institutes of Health deflected animosity the heterosexual white majority held against the gays and blacks and placed the illness in the lap of that very highly critical majority. Whether he was aware of it or not, Dr. Fauci wasn't helping himself out at all in a popularity contest similar to the one today where his poll ratings go up and down in relation to the charts behind him in the White House press briefing room. What is also astonishing about the immunologist's current predicament is that something that is so innocuous is so obvious.
     No wonder that about the same time Dr. Fauci's stigma syndrome first began to develop during the AIDS era, an article in the International Summaries of the National Criminal Justice Reference Service published in 1978, titled "The Effects of Imprisonment of the Self-Image of 'Lifers'," actually described symptoms of the Group I stigma syndrome;
     "The subject feels uncertain and helpless in many situations, the subject has difficulty meeting the demands of his occupation," (5) among others.
In the Group II category, when the "lifer" attempts to reintegrate into society, the subject "represses a great deal and often cannot really voice his opinion." Unfortunately, Dr. Fauci finds himself that very lifer, a cellmate bunkie to a hostile pandemicized society where he takes the blame instead of gay Haitians, and translated to modern standards, the communist Chinese. 


  By late Fall of 1983, Dr Fauci appeared to have reversed course on the transmission of the deadly HIV virus as reported in the Maryland Star Democrat
      "Meanwhile, also on Monday here, a national authority on the ailment said medical information does not show that AIDS is spreading to the nation's general population. Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, chief of the laboratory of communal regulators at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said AIDS continues to be confined to homosexual and bisexual males, intravenous drug users, Haitians and hemophiliacs." (6)
     Again, the immunologist appeared to have reversed course, possibly to head off controversy although that is questionable. It is, however, a similar pattern in the current medical emergency where the doctor has found himself either contradicting his own findings or under criticism from leadership. A month later in 1983, Dr. Fauci was reported to have stated that AIDS was tapering off in New York, but the statement was challenged by other experts who said it "may simply be differences in reporting." (7) That appears to be a sticking point in optimistic forecasts of today's pandemic outlook as well.  Hysteria over the spread of the Acquired Immunity Deficiency Syndrome had boiled over in the media with so-called experts blaming "African AIDS" in men spreading it to prostitutes who infected heterosexual men who then took it home to their wives. In late 1984, Dr. Fauci said;
     "Africans may have other diseases that expose people to AIDS. That probably will not happen in the United States, he says." (8)
     That episode in the controversial life of Dr. Anthony S. Fauci eventually drew to a close but another one waited on the horizon, with similar circumstances. Today he is saddled with repeating history, facing the same challenges and shortcomings, suffering the same stigma syndrome he had to endure during the AIDS era of the last century. Adding to that is a new one brought about by the information technology age, that of the death threat, for himself and his family. We don't know who is making the threats, the doctor and is family have adequate security. Considering this one chapter in his life, it just goes to show what he had to go through and who were his patients, his subjects, and perhaps his hidden enemies in the ranks. 

    There is one lingering thought. That of the "facilitator" who is aware of the immunologist's controversial status during the AIDS era and is deliberately using it (as a tactic) to undermine the current effort by Dr. Fauci to end the coronavirus pandemic. 

Cited
(1) AIDS Vaccine, Indiana (PA) Gazette, 14 July 1978, Page 4
(2) Contract tracing, Indiana (PA) Gazette, 24 Feb 1981, Page 2.
(3) Family contact,  Palm Beach Post, 06 May 1983, Page 97.
(4) JAMA study, The Galveston Daily News, 08 May 1983, Page 16.
(5) Lifer, International Summaries, Volume 2, 1978 (Pages 150-153)
(6) HIV Confined, Maryland Star Democrat, 19 Oct 1983, Page 3.
(7) New York cases, Steve Sternberg, Miami Herald, 15 Nov 1983, Page 122
(8) African AIDS, The Shreveport Journal, 27 Nov 1984, Page 7.

IMMEDREL//ATTN:CD@TCNT//VIA/JC:COC/CMD//URGENT//DECLSF/TTYPE

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

COVID19 & HR 6800--Disinformation Research Funding-- NSF AWARD PROPOSAL

     "...the government will now be tasked in deciding who gets research money to uncover just how disinformation gets out into the public domain ..."     


IMMEDREL//ATTN:CD@TCNT, VIA JC@EOC//URGENT//UNCLDF//TTYPE

     (LAB107) -- Apparently kids can get sick from the virus just like everybody else even though the president insisted they are immune. In response to that recent statement, Facebook removed that insistence, calling it "Covid misinformation." But a spokeswoman for the president's re-election campaign didn't agree, as reported by Donnie O'Sullivan on CNN Business;
     "Courtney Parella, a spokesperson for the Trump campaign, said in response to Facebook's takedown that the President was 'stating a fact that children are less susceptible to the coronavirus.' She accused Silicon Valley of being biased against the President and said 'social media companies are not the arbiters of truth.' " (1)


     Exactly where the truth lies and where the White House is at odds with social media over it, may well be settled in the near future if HR 6800 is passed with the proposed grants for the National Science Foundation (NSF). The current HR 6800 "emergency supplemental appropriations" related to coronavirus relief, passed by the House of Representatives in May and now up for approval in the senate, awards money to the National Science Foundation; 
      "For an additional amount for 'Research and Related Activities', $125,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2022, to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, including to fund research grants, of which $1,000,000 shall be for a study on the spread of COVID–19 related disinformation:" (2)


The section describes research grant funding with a focus on six main points: disinformation and public response, sources of that false info, the role of social media in dissemination, is money being made on the false information, strategies and limitations of disinformation mitigation.
     Given the immense sums of money being doled out if the legislation passes through the senate and the president signs off on it, the disinformation grants amount to a mere pittance compared to some of the bigger expenditures in the proposed bill. But it does represent a new trend, not just by responsible social media as "arbiters of truth," but the government will now be tasked in deciding who gets research money to uncover just how disinformation gets out into the public domain, and somehow manages to go viral, just like the virus itself. 



    The overall transfer of funds to the NSF amounts to $125 million even though only $1 million of that is for disinformation research, as outlined in Title II of Division A of HR 6800. But it's an important step in putting the guilty parties on notice as to possible legislation in the future that will have a more criminal negligence tone to disinformation.  Currently, there doesn't appear to be any direct updates available over at the NSF regarding funding for disinformation, or mention of the proposal in HR 6800. (3)


Facebook removed a Trump post because it violated the company's policies banning 'harmful COVID misinformation'

Facebook took down a post by President Donald Trump for violating its policies against misinformation, the company confirmed. Trump posted a video of his interview with Fox News where he falsely claimed that children are "almost immune" from COVID-19, which CNN reporter Donie O'Sullivan captured before it was removed from Facebook.


References

NSF Logo from government site.

IMMEDREL//ATTN:CD@TCNT, VIA JC@EOC//URGENT//UNCLDF//TTYPE

Tuesday, August 4, 2020

COVID19 UNMASKED--Learned vs Acquired Behavior--THE BIRX-FAUCI FAIL

     "...the Birx-Fauci team fails as expert in its limited immunology role mandating social rules..."  

ATTN: IMMEDREL//CD@TCNT..VIAJC@EOC//URGENT//UNCLASSF--

     (LAB107)--US Congress House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was recently critical of White House Task Force point doctor, Deborah Birx, calling her out for incompetence;
     " 'I think the president has been spreading disinformation about the virus and she is his appointee, so I don't have confidence there, no,' Ms Pelosi told ABC." (1)
The overall dissatisfaction as expressed by the Speaker might reflect the actual lack of diversity in the task force team itself as the root cause of that doubt. Before going into exactly where the fault or failure for the current coronavirus official national policy lies, review of why that shortfall exists is necessary. 
 

     Clearly, the task force was designed using Centers for Disease Control (CDC)  medical experts and immunologists on point, with the Surgeon General's office and Admiral Giroir of the Health and Human Services (HHS), among others. The briefings aired on national television were composed of those members with Vice President Mike Pence as task force director. The briefings gave considerable attention to charts and graphs related to surge and mitigation and evolving from those briefings was a mitigation plan using stay-at-home, testing and face protection mandates. All were in some way or another related to the physiological aspect of medicine, there were no team members related to psychological and social aspects. Then came the "June Swoon."
     In competition with the White House task force were many and myriad state mandates, all in variation with others and still others in direct conflict. The northern states were locked in a bitter struggle with New York City the ground zero for positive cases and deaths. As the weather warmed up, the public at large ignored social-distancing and invaded beaches in the South, where coronavirus rose again in horrible numbers. Out West, a similar situation forced California to reverse course on reopening with hospital ICU beds filled as fast as made available. Throughout all of that development, the economic issue was addressed with bonus unemployment stipends and stimulus checks to the people. That was July, now it's August and the pandemic seems to have only gotten worse.
     Many believed that summer heat would cause a decrease in number of cases, that proved to be false. The President came under fire for his approach, calling for malaria pills as a cure, that also proved false. The President even broke ranks with his own task force and drafted a platoon of outsiders with dubious medical credentials to enforce his claims, which changed on a daily basis. The level of disinformation surrounding the pandemic had reached astronomical proportions. (2) It is no wonder, then, that Speaker Pelosi doubted the direction of the White House in its response.    


     From the beginning, the graphs and charts may have been wrong. The optimism shared at the podium in the briefings didn't pan out with exponential bell curves showing lag times with respect to surge and mitigation. By early summer, with testing ramped up to give a clear picture of the prevalence of the virus in the population, combined with the public's rejection of the campaign of confusion out of the government, confirmed cases changed that graph from a bell curve to a parabolic curve upwards with no limit on the top side. That parabola is a function of two things: first, the lack of expert personnel in the task force beyond physiologists and immunologists; second, the negative response of the population because of that lack of sociologists and psychologists in that same task force. The problem needs to be addressed by understanding the difference between learned and acquired behavior.
     Borrowing from Noam Chomsky, the linguist has developed a theory known as Universal Grammar, or a set of rules innate in all humans at birth that gives each individual the skill to speak the native tongue without a great deal of effort, beginning with childhood. (3) It sets the stage for "learned behavior."  How that differs from "acquired behavior" may be closely scrutinized with respect to the growing resentment of the mitigation component related to the face mask mandate. Directly related to the quadratic increase in positive cases and deaths along with the flouting of social-distancing rules, the public finds itself unable to learn the mask mandate or adjust to the demand of an acquired behavior. It is here also where the Birx-Fauci team fails as expert in its limited immunology role mandating social rules. 
     Borrowing again, this time from psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), there are limits to what childhood trauma such as bedwetting and a castration complex can reveal about why many in society refuse to wear a mask at the grocery store and deliberately cough on the produce. There is, however, a deeper rooting of the particular mask refusal syndrome discoverable in Freud's pleasure principle-death drive theory (4) A better explanation comes in the form of the difference in classical (Ivan Pavlov, 1849-1936) versus operant (B. F. Skinner,. 1904-1990) conditioning;
     "Operant conditioning is a method of learning that occurs through rewards and punishments for behavior. Through operant conditioning, an individual makes an association between a particular behavior and a consequence." (5)
   

      Skinner broke ranks with Pavlov and his dogs by suggesting certain traits are not just learned or anticipated, but behavior needed to be reinforced. That did not mean the population had to have the proverbial tabula rasa (6) on collective behavior, It infers here that since the population had never "learned" to wear a mask in public, it had to be an "acquired" trait. Many theoreticians in the fields of linguistics and sociology might consider the two terms to mean essentially the same thing, in the case of pandemic mechanics, they do not. The individual has never learned to wear a mask and must be conditioned operationally to do so, using force if necessary to enforce the mandate. 
    The dilemma facing the government is how to make the public adhere to the rules of social distancing and facial protective coverings. By all accounts, the pandemic may never go away, but we have only heard from the experts on the physiology side of the medical profession. Word of a vaccine cure changes with the direction of the wind, and that doesn't address the current infected population, just a long range solution still being developed in the laboratory. On a much larger scale, the role of natural selection has yet to be determined as to whether the human race is fit to survive the pandemic but that is left to another legion of experts.


Footnotes: 

     The current HR 6800 "emergency supplemental appropriations" related to coronavirus relief, passed by the House of Representatives in May and now up for approval in the senate, awards money to the National Science Foundation; 
     "For an additional amount for 'Research and Related Activities', $125,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2022, to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, including to fund research grants, of which $1,000,000 shall be for a study on the spread of COVID–19 related disinformation:" (7)
     The section describes research grant funding with a focus on six main points: disinformation and public response, sources of that false info, the role of social media in dissemination, is money being made on the false information, strategies and limitations of disinformation mitigation. The section fails to suggest research directed at the lack of qualified experts on the task force other than those in a physiology capacity. The vacuum created by the limited knowledge of the task force staff with respect to sociological reaction to mitigation measures is a direct contributor to that disinformation.

Late Addition:  08/06/2020/1400 PDT:

McConnell: Wearing a mask is 'single most significant thing' to fight pandemic

Senate Majority Leader (R-Ky.) on Thursday said wearing a mask is the single most important thing Americans can do to contain the coronavirus pandemic and get the U.S. economy back on its feet, setting up a contrast with , who rarely wears a mask.


Cited





ATTN: IMMEDREL//CD@TCNT..VIAJC@EOC//URGENT//UNCLASSF--

...


RED FLAG
Checkpoint Charlie: NATO, Article 5 and the Berlin Wall

There was no North American Treaty Organization, NATO, immediately following the close of World War Two. By the close of the decade, due to pressure from the Soviet Union, particularly in Germany, the alliance was formed with 12 initial members. The concept of “collective security” had been around for over 30 years, at least on the Continent, with respect to the World War One League of Nations; neither the United States nor the Soviet Union were members. (09 March 2025)
Red Flag: The U.S.-Japan Security Pact of 1960
The recent statement by the White House concerning a “bilateral” treaty between the United States and Japan from 1960 raised the issue of the former’s lack of a security-military commitment, with the latter doing the heavy lifting. It comes as no surprise in light of other treaties such as NATO in Europe with the U.S. again carrying The Weight.
Part and parcel to how it all unfolded had to do with certain ambiguous positions by the two nations coupled with the American public not totally informed of the agreement. The situation was quite different in Japan. (09 March 2025)

...


BORDERLANDS
Ukraine: The Art of the (Peace) Deal
Nations are big on treaties, enforcing them is another matter. This paper traces some of the more recent, failed and otherwise, then takes a close look at one of the most controversial in history, The Versailles Treaty at the end of World War One. (09 March 2025)

Ukraine and The Rubio Doctrine The purpose of this report is to test the secretary’s three core principles against the Ukraine conflict to see if they are viable and would have been if he became president in the 2015 election. (09 March 2025)

Ukraine Betrayed: American Robber Barons to Steal Rare Minerals
Ukraine possesses significant reserves of rare earth minerals and other critical raw materials that are essential for modern technology and industry. According to reports, Ukraine has deposits of 22 out of 34 minerals identified as critical by the European Union. (09 March 2025)

...


MOONDUNES
Space Station Freedom 1993: The “Fiscal Black Hole"

Space Station Freedom was a NASA-led initiative proposed in the 1980s aimed at creating a permanently crewed space station in low Earth orbit. The project was initially announced by President Ronald Reagan in his 1984 State of the Union Address, highlighting its potential as a platform for scientific research and international collaboration in space exploration. (09 March 2025)