Thursday, July 18, 2019

CH212.3001--"America for Americans" 1935--DEMOCRATS HAWK DEPORTATION OF FOREIGNERS


CH212.3001
J.L'Angelle
Univ of Nevada, Reno
Summer 2019

HR4860, The Dies Committee, RR Reynolds, et al.


      Republican rhetoric isn't the only place where "go back to your own country," language can be found. In radio broadcasts and subcommittee hearings (HR4860) as far back as 1935-40, Democrats such as JJ Dempsey from New Mexico voiced similar ideology;
     "I do not care whether a man is a Communist or a Nazi or a Fascist, if he is not satisfied with our form of government and wants to substitute the form of government of his own country, he should return to his own country and not bother us."  (Dempsey, Gov Printing Office)
Sentiment ran high for deportation as rising tides of revolution and war swept across Europe and Russia with Hitler and Stalin coming to power.
     But Dempsey wasn't the only Democrat with a desire to run everyone out of the United States who wasn't American. In his radio address to the nation titled "America for Americans" delivered in May of 1935, Congressman Martin Dies (D-TX) was even more explicit on determination to run foreigners out of the United States;


     "But you ask, and properly so, what are we going to do about it? I agree with you that there is nothing we can do so long as our policy is dominated by sentimentality, fatuous internationalism, industrial greed, and alien political influence. So long as we permit America to be made the asylum for the peoples of other lands and the dumping ground for Europe and so long as politicians fear the vote and influence of alien groups and blocs in the great cities, there is nothing that we can do." (Dies, DNA Learning Ctr)
Taking it one step further, Rep. Dies pegs the kidnapping of the Lindbergh child by foreigner Bruno Hauptmann to lax immigration policy (Detroit Free Press) Demonization of foreigners as a disruptive force in the American way of life appears to have champions on both sides of the aisle in the halls of Congress.
     Further hyping the anti-foreigner agenda in the period that led to the outbreak of World War Two was Senator RR Reynolds of North Carolina, one of Roosevelts New Deal Democrats. In keeping with a states rights perspective, many of his ideas and legislative efforts were directed at making North Carolina great again;
     "His anti-communism notwithstanding, Reynolds supported Roosevelt’s recognition of the Soviet Union so that the communist nation might buy North Carolina goods.  A staunch unilateralist, he opposed U. S. adherence to the World Court, for he considered it a tactic to enter the failed League of Nations.  During his senatorial career, Reynolds advocated strict limits on immigration, the registration of all aliens, and the deportation of alien criminals.  In particular, the nativist Reynolds deemed most aliens as a threat to American security, values, and jobs, so he co-authored the Reynolds-Starnes Bill (1936) that called for cutting immigration quotas by 90%." (North Carolina History)
Rather naïve when it came to Nazi deception and scheming, his reported anti-Semitic stance was used to their advantage at his expense, but the image damage was done, possibly due to his allegiance first to North Carolina.
     Yet another attempt to exploit anti-foreigner sentiment originated in the (Martin) Dies Committee and the effort to expel Australian born Harry Bridges of the west coast Longshoreman's Union and subsequent attempt to impeach the Secretary of Labor, Frances Perkins. (JSTOR)
     At the HR4860 hearings in 1935, John Thomas Taylor of the American Legion had this to say about bigotry;
     "Resolved, That we urge national legislation that will punish American citizens who advocate the overthrow of our Government by force, fraud, or violence, or seek to promote race or religious prejudice, and deport all aliens who do like- wise. " (HR4860)
The sentiment to condemn anybody in the United States who chose to promote hatred on cultural grounds was clearly in the minds of veterans before the outbreak of the Second World War.
     Singling out a particular representative of the government, whether it be the president or members of Congress is nothing more than a political move to create partisanship amid catcalling and name tagging such as "racist," and "bigot." From the official record, Democrats have just as many guilty in their political party as do Republicans. Now is not the time to create an even greater cultural fissure of ideology but to offer remedies to the difficult issues surrounding foreigners and immigrants.

Works Cited
 Dempsey, JJ, HR 4860,  https://www.loc.gov/law/find/hearings/pdf/00108304534.pdf
Dies, M., https://www.dnalc.org/view/11023--America-for-Americans-Radio-address-of-Hon-Martin-Dies-of-Texas-May-6-1935-about-deportation-1-.html
Lindbergh baby, (Detroit Free Press, 10 Jan 1935, Page 5.)
Reynolds, https://northcarolinahistory.org/commentary/senator-robert-rice-reynolds-an-atypical-tar-heel-politician-and-isolationist/
Mansfield, HC., Impeach Perkins, Public Administration Review, Vol. 1, No. 3 (Spring, 1941), pp. 281-286

Dies Committee photo, Pictured as the final hearing closed are, left to right, seated: Rep. Harold G. Mosier, Ohio-Chairman Martin Dies. and Rep. J. Parnell Thomas of New Jersey. Standing, left to right: Rep. John J. Dempsey of New Mexico; Ree. Stripling, Secretary to the committee, and John Metcalf, Chief Investigator, 12/18/38 (Wikimedia)
Posted by at

...

RED FLAG
Checkpoint Charlie: NATO, Article 5 and the Berlin Wall
There was no North American Treaty Organization, NATO, immediately following the close of World War Two. By the close of the decade, due to pressure from the Soviet Union, particularly in Germany, the alliance was formed with 12 initial members. The concept of “collective security” had been around for over 30 years, at least on the Continent, with respect to the World War One League of Nations; neither the United States nor the Soviet Union were members. (09 March 2025)
Red Flag: The U.S.-Japan Security Pact of 1960
The recent statement by the White House concerning a “bilateral” treaty between the United States and Japan from 1960 raised the issue of the former’s lack of a security-military commitment, with the latter doing the heavy lifting. It comes as no surprise in light of other treaties such as NATO in Europe with the U.S. again carrying The Weight.
Part and parcel to how it all unfolded had to do with certain ambiguous positions by the two nations coupled with the American public not totally informed of the agreement. The situation was quite different in Japan. (09 March 2025)

...

BORDERLANDS
Ukraine: The Art of the (Peace) Deal
Nations are big on treaties, enforcing them is another matter. This paper traces some of the more recent, failed and otherwise, then takes a close look at one of the most controversial in history, The Versailles Treaty at the end of World War One. (09 March 2025)

Ukraine and The Rubio Doctrine The purpose of this report is to test the secretary’s three core principles against the Ukraine conflict to see if they are viable and would have been if he became president in the 2015 election. (09 March 2025)

Ukraine Betrayed: American Robber Barons to Steal Rare Minerals
Ukraine possesses significant reserves of rare earth minerals and other critical raw materials that are essential for modern technology and industry. According to reports, Ukraine has deposits of 22 out of 34 minerals identified as critical by the European Union. (09 March 2025)

...

MOONDUNES
Space Station Freedom 1993: The “Fiscal Black Hole"
Space Station Freedom was a NASA-led initiative proposed in the 1980s aimed at creating a permanently crewed space station in low Earth orbit. The project was initially announced by President Ronald Reagan in his 1984 State of the Union Address, highlighting its potential as a platform for scientific research and international collaboration in space exploration. (09 March 2025)