Friday, November 15, 2024

#COP29BAKU--Activist Doublespeak--EQUITABLE INCLUSION EMPTY RHETORIC


//WHITE LIGHTNING AI RESEARCH//IMMEDREL//11/15/24/1300PST//

#COP29Baku--Climate Action Doublespeak 11/15/24/1300PST: Kick Big Polluters Out wants it both ways; calls for "equitable inclusion," then makes demands to remove petroleum lobbyists from conference, demagogue rhetoric. #Trump to "Parexit" from Paris Agreement, repeal IRA. #COP29Azerbaijan
(Image credit: Washington Post)

Begin Perplexity-AI

kick big polluters out equitable inclusion

The Kick Big Polluters Out coalition advocates for a significant shift in climate policy, emphasizing the need for equitable and meaningful inclusion of civil society, particularly those most affected by climate change. Their demands center around removing the influence of major polluters from climate negotiations and ensuring that the voices of frontline communities are prioritized.

Key Demands

  1. No More Writing the Rules: The coalition insists that big polluters should not participate in climate policymaking, as their involvement undermines global efforts to combat climate change. They call for the establishment of an Accountability Framework by the UNFCCC to prevent corporate capture of climate policies and require full disclosure of interests by all participants
    1
    2
    .
  2. No More Bankrolling Climate Action: The coalition opposes any partnerships or sponsorships from major polluters at climate events. They argue that allowing these entities to fund climate talks enables them to greenwash their image while evading responsibility for their role in the crisis
    1
    2
    .
  3. Polluters Out - People In: The coalition highlights the need for genuine participation from civil society and frontline communities in climate discussions. They demand that these voices be centered in climate action, rather than allowing polluter interests to dictate terms
    1
    2
    .
  4. Reset the System: A fundamental transformation is needed in how society approaches environmental issues. The coalition calls for a shift towards systems that prioritize social justice, environmental restoration, and community-led solutions, advocating for a rapid and equitable transition away from fossil fuels
    1
    2
    .

Current Context

As highlighted during recent COP negotiations, the fossil fuel industry has increasingly dominated discussions, with reports indicating that fossil fuel lobbyists outnumber representatives from vulnerable nations and scientific institutions at these events. For instance, at COP29, over 1,773 fossil fuel lobbyists were present, surpassing the combined representation of the ten most climate-vulnerable countries
3
4
.
 This situation underscores the urgency of reforming the COP process to ensure fair representation and accountability.The coalition's efforts are part of a broader movement to challenge systemic injustices perpetuated by fossil fuel interests and advocate for a more inclusive approach to climate action that genuinely reflects the needs of affected communities
5

kick big polluters out doublespeak


The "Kick Big Polluters Out" campaign is a coalition of civil society organizations advocating for the exclusion of fossil fuel lobbyists from international climate negotiations. This movement has gained traction as evidence mounts regarding the detrimental influence of these lobbyists on climate action.

Background and Objectives

The campaign emphasizes that Big Polluters—primarily fossil fuel companies—have historically manipulated public perception and delayed meaningful climate action through extensive lobbying efforts. They have been accused of engaging in a "decades-long deception campaign," characterized by disinformation and strategic obstruction of policies aimed at mitigating climate change
3
4
.
 The coalition argues that these companies have rigged the system designed to address the climate crisis, leading to catastrophic environmental consequences
1
2
.

Recent Developments

As COP29 approaches, the campaign highlights alarming statistics regarding fossil fuel lobbyists' attendance at UN climate talks. An analysis revealed that these lobbyists have participated over 7,200 times in such discussions over the past two decades, significantly outnumbering representatives from vulnerable communities and nations
2
4
.
 This presence raises concerns about the integrity of climate negotiations, as many feel that allowing polluters to influence discussions undermines efforts to achieve substantial climate goals.

Key Quotes from Activists

Activists within the KBPO coalition have voiced strong sentiments against the presence of fossil fuel interests at COP events:
  • Brenna TwoBears from the Indigenous Environmental Network stated, "When fossil fuel emissions make up around 90 percent of global carbon emissions, how can they be allowed into the one place meant to address the climate crisis?"
    2
    .
  • Pat Bohland from LIFE e.V. emphasized the urgency of excluding these corporations: "These greedy corporations cannot be allowed into the UNFCCC because fossil fuels tip the world closer and closer to extinction every day" 
    2
    .

Calls for Action

The coalition is urging world governments to heed public demands and take decisive steps to remove fossil fuel lobbyists from climate talks. They argue that this is essential for restoring credibility to international negotiations and ensuring that they prioritize environmental sustainability and equity over corporate profits
1
2
.
In summary, the "Kick Big Polluters Out" movement seeks to reclaim climate discussions from corporate influence, advocating for a more equitable and science-based approach to tackling global warming.

End Perplexity-AI

//WHITE LIGHTNING AI RESEARCH//IMMEDREL//11/15/24/1300PST//

...


RED FLAG
Checkpoint Charlie: NATO, Article 5 and the Berlin Wall

There was no North American Treaty Organization, NATO, immediately following the close of World War Two. By the close of the decade, due to pressure from the Soviet Union, particularly in Germany, the alliance was formed with 12 initial members. The concept of “collective security” had been around for over 30 years, at least on the Continent, with respect to the World War One League of Nations; neither the United States nor the Soviet Union were members. (09 March 2025)
Red Flag: The U.S.-Japan Security Pact of 1960
The recent statement by the White House concerning a “bilateral” treaty between the United States and Japan from 1960 raised the issue of the former’s lack of a security-military commitment, with the latter doing the heavy lifting. It comes as no surprise in light of other treaties such as NATO in Europe with the U.S. again carrying The Weight.
Part and parcel to how it all unfolded had to do with certain ambiguous positions by the two nations coupled with the American public not totally informed of the agreement. The situation was quite different in Japan. (09 March 2025)

...


BORDERLANDS
Ukraine: The Art of the (Peace) Deal
Nations are big on treaties, enforcing them is another matter. This paper traces some of the more recent, failed and otherwise, then takes a close look at one of the most controversial in history, The Versailles Treaty at the end of World War One. (09 March 2025)

Ukraine and The Rubio Doctrine The purpose of this report is to test the secretary’s three core principles against the Ukraine conflict to see if they are viable and would have been if he became president in the 2015 election. (09 March 2025)

Ukraine Betrayed: American Robber Barons to Steal Rare Minerals
Ukraine possesses significant reserves of rare earth minerals and other critical raw materials that are essential for modern technology and industry. According to reports, Ukraine has deposits of 22 out of 34 minerals identified as critical by the European Union. (09 March 2025)

...


MOONDUNES
Space Station Freedom 1993: The “Fiscal Black Hole"

Space Station Freedom was a NASA-led initiative proposed in the 1980s aimed at creating a permanently crewed space station in low Earth orbit. The project was initially announced by President Ronald Reagan in his 1984 State of the Union Address, highlighting its potential as a platform for scientific research and international collaboration in space exploration. (09 March 2025)