Tuesday, November 12, 2024

KRISTI NOEM PLAYBOOK---Senate Confirmation Hearings for DHS-- PERPLEXITY AI-CAPSULE


WHITE LIGHTNING OFFICE OF POLITICAL INFORMATION//11/12/24/1010PST

fema funds transfer to immigration disinfo

     #KristiNoem DHS Nominee 11/12/24/0830PST: How will  #Trump appointee respond to Senate confirmation on election disinfo of #FEMA funds transfer for #immigration, traced to GOP candidate, placing millions in path of #HurricaneHelene recovery?  AI-Cap: https://shorturl.at/IJtiD


Perplexity AI-Capsule:


     (Begin AI) In recent days, there has been widespread misinformation circulating about the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and its disaster relief funds, particularly in relation to Hurricane Helene recovery efforts and immigration issues. Here's a summary of the situation:





False Claims

Former* President Donald Trump and some of his allies have been spreading false claims that:

  1. FEMA disaster relief funds were diverted to support migrants or border-related issues13.

  2. FEMA has run out of money for hurricane recovery due to spending on migrants4.


The Facts

These claims are demonstrably false:

  1. No disaster relief funding has been used to support migrants or housing services34.

  2. FEMA's disaster response efforts and individual assistance are funded through the Disaster Relief Fund, which is a dedicated fund for disaster efforts5.

  3. The Disaster Relief Fund money has not been diverted to other, non-disaster related efforts5.


Separate Funding Sources

The confusion seems to stem from misunderstanding two distinct funding sources:

  1. FEMA's Disaster Relief Fund: Used exclusively for disaster recovery efforts16.

  2. Shelter and Services Program (SSP): A separate program funded by Customs and Border Protection to assist communities dealing with migrant influxes17.


FEMA's Response

FEMA has taken steps to counter this misinformation:

  1. Created a fact-checking page on its website45.

  2. FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell publicly refuted these claims, calling them "ridiculous and just plain false"4.


Impact of Misinformation

The spread of such false information can have serious consequences:

  1. It may discourage disaster survivors from seeking necessary assistance6.

  2. It undermines trust in government agencies during critical times4.


Historical Context

Ironically, in 2019, the Trump administration actually did attempt to divert some FEMA funds for border-related purposes:

  1. Trump's administration informed Congress of plans to shift $271 million from DHS, including $155 million from FEMA's Disaster Relief Fund, for immigration-related expenses3.

  2. This move was criticized by Democratic leaders at the time3.

It's crucial for the public to rely on official sources and fact-check information, especially during times of crisis and natural disasters. Misinformation can hinder recovery efforts and potentially harm those in need of assistance.


How did the misinformation about FEMA funds and migrants start


The misinformation about FEMA funds being diverted to support migrants largely originated from false claims made by former President Donald Trump and some of his supporters. These claims suggested that the Biden administration was using FEMA's disaster relief funds to house illegal migrants, which is not true124.


How the Misinformation Started

  1. Trump's Claims: During rallies and public statements, Trump falsely alleged that FEMA disaster funds were being redirected to support migrants. He claimed that the Biden administration had misappropriated these funds, which contributed to FEMA's supposed lack of resources for hurricane recovery efforts12.

  2. Historical Context: Ironically, Trump himself attempted a similar action in 2019 when his administration proposed shifting $271 million, including $155 million from FEMA's Disaster Relief Fund, to cover costs associated with immigration enforcement at the southern border25. This historical action may have fueled the plausibility of his current claims among supporters.

  3. Media Amplification: These unfounded claims were further amplified by conservative media outlets and figures like Elon Musk, who shared and supported these assertions on social media platforms12.

  4. Confusion Between Funding Sources: The misinformation may also stem from a misunderstanding between two separate funding programs: FEMA's Disaster Relief Fund and the Shelter and Services Program (SSP). The SSP is funded through Customs and Border Protection and is meant to assist communities facing an influx of migrants, but it is entirely separate from FEMA's disaster relief efforts15.


Impact of Misinformation

  • Public Confusion: The spread of these false claims has led to confusion among the public, potentially discouraging disaster survivors from seeking necessary assistance.

  • Government Response: Both FEMA and the White House have actively worked to debunk these myths by clarifying that no disaster relief funds have been diverted for migrant services45. They have emphasized that funding for migrant services comes from a separate budget allocated by Congress.

This misinformation highlights the challenges faced by government agencies in combating false narratives during times of crisis, which can undermine public trust and hinder effective disaster response efforts.  (End AI)


*Note the AI addresses President Trump as "Former" in the first section of the AI in "False Claims."

WHITE LIGHTNING OFFICE OF POLITICAL INFORMATION//11/12/24/1010PST

Posted by at

...

RED FLAG
Checkpoint Charlie: NATO, Article 5 and the Berlin Wall
There was no North American Treaty Organization, NATO, immediately following the close of World War Two. By the close of the decade, due to pressure from the Soviet Union, particularly in Germany, the alliance was formed with 12 initial members. The concept of “collective security” had been around for over 30 years, at least on the Continent, with respect to the World War One League of Nations; neither the United States nor the Soviet Union were members. (09 March 2025)
Red Flag: The U.S.-Japan Security Pact of 1960
The recent statement by the White House concerning a “bilateral” treaty between the United States and Japan from 1960 raised the issue of the former’s lack of a security-military commitment, with the latter doing the heavy lifting. It comes as no surprise in light of other treaties such as NATO in Europe with the U.S. again carrying The Weight.
Part and parcel to how it all unfolded had to do with certain ambiguous positions by the two nations coupled with the American public not totally informed of the agreement. The situation was quite different in Japan. (09 March 2025)

...

BORDERLANDS
Ukraine: The Art of the (Peace) Deal
Nations are big on treaties, enforcing them is another matter. This paper traces some of the more recent, failed and otherwise, then takes a close look at one of the most controversial in history, The Versailles Treaty at the end of World War One. (09 March 2025)

Ukraine and The Rubio Doctrine The purpose of this report is to test the secretary’s three core principles against the Ukraine conflict to see if they are viable and would have been if he became president in the 2015 election. (09 March 2025)

Ukraine Betrayed: American Robber Barons to Steal Rare Minerals
Ukraine possesses significant reserves of rare earth minerals and other critical raw materials that are essential for modern technology and industry. According to reports, Ukraine has deposits of 22 out of 34 minerals identified as critical by the European Union. (09 March 2025)

...

MOONDUNES
Space Station Freedom 1993: The “Fiscal Black Hole"
Space Station Freedom was a NASA-led initiative proposed in the 1980s aimed at creating a permanently crewed space station in low Earth orbit. The project was initially announced by President Ronald Reagan in his 1984 State of the Union Address, highlighting its potential as a platform for scientific research and international collaboration in space exploration. (09 March 2025)